Friday 29 December 2017

Shyam Sundar Singh, Aged about 50 years, S/o Late Mr. Mitthu Singh, R/o Village and Post Maharipur, Tahsil and District – Basti, 272 001 (Uttar Pradesh)

BY THE REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWELDGEMENT DUE

To,

1.   The Union of India,
Through the Secretary to Govt. of India,
Department of Road Transport and Highways,
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways,
Transport Bhavan, 1, Parliament Street,
New Delhi-110001, INDIA.
E-mail : 
secy-road@nic.in
Tel: 23753991 (O)
FAX : 91-011-23714104 

2.   National Highways Authority of India,
Through The Chairman,
G 5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka,
New Delhi - 110 075, INDIA.
Phone: 91-011-25074100 & 25074200
Fax : 91-011-25093507, 25093514

3.   THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,
National Highway Authority of India,
633, Shivlia Road, Mohaddipur,
Gorakhpur – 273 008 (Uttar Pradesh).

4.   The State of Uttar Pradesh,
Through The Collector,
District – Basti, (Uttar Pradesh).

5.   The Special Land Acquisition Officer
District – Basti, (Uttar Pradesh).


Dear Sir (s),

Under instructions from my clients (1) Dr. Vindhya Chal Singh, Aged about 65 years, S/o Late Mr. Mitthu Singh, R/o B-25, Siddharth Lake City, Anand Nagar, Raisen Road, Bhopal 462 021 (Madhya Pradesh) and (2) Mr. Shyam Sundar Singh, Aged about 50 years, S/o Late Mr. Mitthu Singh, R/o Village and Post Maharipur, Tahsil and District – Basti, 272 001 (Uttar Pradesh), I, serve you with notice as under :

1.   Land bearing Gata (Plot) Nos. 211 area measuring 0 Bigha 4 Biswas and 13 Biswansis situated at Village Sanasarpur and Land bearing Gata (Plot) Nos.  12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 60, 107 area measuring 1 Bigha 5 Biswas and 19 Biswansis Village Amhat of Paragana Nagar Purab, Tahsil and District Basti (Uttar Pradesh ) belonging to my aforesaid clients were acquired for construction of a road for which the my aforesaid clients are legally entitled to payment of compensation.

2.   You notice No. 1 to 3 for whose benefit the land of the my aforesaid clients has been acquired. You notice No. 4 & 5 who are to make such payment under the Law.

3.   The Governor of Uttar Pradesh was pleased to order notification No. 7525 / 46 (II) / L (18) –OSD 84, dated January 10, 1986 for general information which was published in Uttar Pradesh Gazette dated 12, July 1986 at page 951:

4.   Under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act No. 1 of 1894) read with the Government of India, Ministry of Home affairs notification No. 20/1/55 Judl. (I) dated May 14, 1955, The Governor of Uttar Pradesh was pleased to notify for general information that the mention in the Schedule below is needed for a public purposes, namely for construction of approach road to New Bridge over River Kuwano in K.M. 195 on N. H. No. 28 in District Basti.

5.   Being of the opinion that the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (1-A) of Section 17 of the said Act are applicable to the said land in as much as the said land which is waste or arable, as well as other than waste and arable is urgently required for the construction of aforesaid road and that in view of the prevailing urgency as well necessary to eliminate the delay inquiry under Section 5-A of the said Act, the Governor was pleased to direct under sub-section (4) of section 17 of the said Act that the provisions of said act shall not apply.

Schedule


S. No.
District
Pargana
Mauza
Gata (Plot) No
Approximate Area
1.
Basti
Nagar Purab
Sansarpur
211
0-4-13
2.
Basti
Nagar Purab
Amhat
12
13
14
15
16
17
60
107
0-3-0
0-3-18
0-4-9
0-5-11
0-4-16
0-0-18
0-1-15
0-1-12

6.   The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 is a law in India and Pakistan that allows the government to acquire private land in those countries.
7.   “Land Acquisition” literally means acquiring of land for some public purpose by government/government agency, as authorised by the law, from the individual landowner(s) after paying a government fixed compensation in lieu of losses incurred by land owner(s) due to surrendering of his/their land to the concerned government agency.

“THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894

(1 OF 1894)

(As modified up to the Ist September, 1985)

4. Publication of preliminary notification and power of officers thereupon. - (1) Whenever it appears to the [appropriate Government] the land in any locality [is needed or] is likely to be needed for any public purpose [or for a company], a notification to that effect shall be published in the Official Gazette [and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language], and the Collector shall cause public notice of the substance of such notification to be given at convenient places in the said locality [(the last of the dates of such publication and the giving of such public notice , being hereinafter referred to as the date of the publication of the notification)].

(2) Thereupon it shall be lawful for any officer, either generally or specially authorized by such Government in this behalf, and for his servants and workman, -

to enter upon and survey and take levels of any land in such locality;
 to dig or bore into the sub-soil; 

to do all other acts necessary to ascertain whether the land is adapted for such purpose; 


to set out the boundaries of the land proposed to be taken and the intended line of the work (if any) proposed to be made thereon;

to mark such levels, boundaries and line by placing marks and cutting trenches;

and, where otherwise the survey cannot be completed and the levels taken and the boundaries and line marked, to cut down and clear away any part of any standing crop, fence or jungle; 

Provided that no person shall enter into any building or upon any enclosed court or garden attached to a dwelling house (unless with the consent of the occupier thereof) without previously giving such occupier at least seven days' notice in writing of his intention to do so”. 


8.   The land acquisition act of 1894 was created with the expressed purpose of facilitating the government’s acquisition of privately held land for public purposes. The word "public purpose", as defined in the act, refers to the acquisition of land for putting up educational institutions or schemes such as housing, health or slum clearance, apart from the projects for rural planning or formation of sites. The word "government" refers to the central government if the purpose for acquisition is for the union and for all other purposes it refers to the state government. It is not necessary that all the acquisition has to be initiated by the government alone. Local authorities, societies registered under the societies registration act, 1860 and co-operative societies established under the co-operative societies act can also acquire the land for developmental activities through the government.

9.   The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is the nodal agency responsible for building, upgrading and maintaining most of the national highways network. It operates under the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) is a major effort to expand and upgrade the network of highway network. NHAI often uses a public-private partnership model for highway development, maintenance and toll-collection. The NHAI was created through the promulgation of the National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988. In February 1995, the Authority was formally made an autonomous body.
It is responsible for the development, maintenance, management and operation of National Highways, totaling over 71,772 km (44,597 mi) in length.

Notification
10.                The process of acquisition begins with the issuance of preliminary notification, as envisaged under section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The notification has to be essentially published in the official gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language. Further, it is also necessary that the notification has to be affixed in conspicuous places of that locality.

Filing of objections
11.                The main objective of issuing preliminary notification is to call for objections, if any, against such acquisitions from the owners or others who are having certain interest over the property; giving them an opportunity to raise their claims against the move of the government for acquiring their lands. The persons aggrieved by such notification shall file their objections within thirty days from the date of preliminary notification(date of the publication of notification).

Final declaration
12.                After receipt of objections, the concerned authority shall consider those objections, and if found unsatisfactory, then a final declaration rejecting the claims will be issued. Section 6 of the amended Act provides that the final declaration shall be issued by the authority within a period of one year from the date of issuance of preliminary notification under section 4(1) of the Act. However, prior to the amendment, the time stipulated under the Act for final declaration was three years from the date of publication of the preliminary notification. The final declaration has to be published as required under section 6(2) of the Act.

Award
13.                Section 11 of the Act provides that after receiving the objections, the authority will have to hold an enquiry. However, it is necessary that actual extent of land proposed to be acquired and the value of the land has to be assessed before starting the enquiry, as required under sections 8 and 9 of the statute. On completion of the enquiry, award will be passed to that effect and published by the competent authority. After passing the award, the Collector or the Deputy Commissioner shall send notice to the owners or their representatives who were not present personally at the time of passing of the Award.

Time limit
14.                Once the enquiry is concluded, it is the duty of the competent authority to pass the award within two years from the date of publication of the declaration under section 6, as envisaged under section 11 A of the Act. If the authority fails to adhere to the time schedule prescribed under the Act, the entire proceedings initiated for land acquisition will lapse. After passing of the award, the Deputy Commissioner or any other competent authority may take possession of the land immediately, which shall thereupon vest absolutely with the government, free from all claims, whatsoever.

Special powers
15.                Section 17 of the Act confers special powers with the concerned authority wherein passing of award may be dispensed with and yet permits to take possession of the land notified for acquisition. Further holding of enquiry can also be waived, as envisaged under section 5 A of the Act. However, such powers can be exercised only in case of urgency. After passing of the award, the person whose land has been proposed to be acquired can give his consent for such acquisition and agree to receive the compensation.

16.                Objections can also be raised against the measurement of the land, enhancement of compensation or apportionment of the compensation by filing a written application before the Deputy Commissioner, as provided under section 18 of the Act, requesting the authority to refer the matter to the court for determination of the grounds raised in the application. An application to that effect has to be filed by the person who was personally present when the award was passed, within six weeks from the date of the award passed by the Collector. In other cases, the application will have to be made within six weeks from the date of receipt of the notice issued under section 12(2) or within six months from the date of the award passed by Deputy Commissioner, whichever is earlier.
Compensation
17.                Provision for settlement of dispute pertaining to apportionment of the compensation amount is available under section 30 of the Act. In such a situation, the Deputy Commissioner should refer the matter to the court. The claimant will be entitled to the compensation which is determined on the basis of the market value of the land determined as on the date of preliminary notification. According to section 34, if there is delay in payment of compensation beyond one year from the date on which possession is taken,]]]] interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the outstanding amount of compensation till the date of payment.

18.                Judicial Interpretation of the word "Dispute" in the land acquisition proceedings—State of Madras Vs. B.V. Subramania Iyer AIR 1962 Mad. 313- The Word “Dispute”- Includes any controversy with regard to the title of a single claimant- The word ‘dispute’ has been used in a wide and not in a literal sense and implies any controversy at to title, whether as between the actual claimants, or as appearing from the documents made available by the government. It is obvious that when the government exercises its power of eminent domain and acquires property, Public funds have to be utilized for the payment of compensation to the true owner, and not merely to any claimant who cares to appear on the scene. The government has a special responsibility in this regard, and cannot later take refuge behind the pretext that the compensation was paid to the claimant who actually appeared wile others did not appeared. So long as that is the situation the acquiring officer has a right to make such a reference, even if a dispute or controversy as to the arises on the documents before him. He cannot be made liable for costs, and it is the party who has to bear the costs incurred in establishing the title, of the party to receive the compensation amount.
19.                Status of the Tenant occupying the land to be acquired under Land Acquisition Act, 1894—M/s Indarprastha Ice and Cold Storage Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIR 1987 Del 171- Tenant is entitled to only a nominal compensation- Only a nominal portion of the compensation of the acquired land is to be paid to the tenant and substantial amount has to be taken by the landlord. The tenant is not entitled to 1/3 or 1/4 of the amount of compensation on the basis of judicial decisions relating to agricultural land on which the tenant had aright to purchase under Section 18 of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act. The tenant is only entitled to 1/8 share of the compensation.

20.                The government, under section 16 of the Act is at liberty to withdraw from acquisition of land except in cases provided under section 36. However, if the possession of land has been taken, then the government will have no authority to withdraw from such acquisition.

Procedure for the Land Acquisition

Investigation
21.                When a local authority or a company requires a land, an application is required to be made by it to the revenue authority.
22.                The application should be accompanied with a copy of the plan showing survey nos., purpose of acquisition and the reason for the particular site to be chosen and the provision made for the cost of the acquisition.
23.                After the government has been fully satisfied about the purpose, the least area needed, and other relevant facts as provided under land acquisition rules, it will issue a notification under Section 4 of the act that the particular land is required for public purpose.
24.                One of the revenue officers is appointed as the collector to hold an inquiry under Section 5-A of the Act.
25.                After notification the owner is prohibited from selling his property or disposing of it and prevented from carrying out any works of improvements for which no compensation will be paid if executed without prior permission from the collector.

Objection and Confirmation
26.                Objections are invited from all persons interested in land within thirty days from the date of notification.
26.    The objections will be valid on one or more of the following grounds:
i. That the purpose for which the land is proposed for acquisition is not a public purpose.
ii. That the land is not or less suitable than another piece of land for the said purpose.
iii. That the area under acquisition is excessive.
iv. That the acquisition will destroy or impair historical or artistic monuments or will desecrate religious buildings, graveyards and the like.

27.The collector after hearing the objections will submit his report to the government who will finally declare the land for acquisition under the Section 6 of the Act.
28.After notification the collector proceeds with the claim. He has the site marked out, measured and a plan of the same is made.

Claim and Award
29.The collector will issue notices under Section 9 to all persons interested in the acquisition to file their claim reports.
30.The collector is not to be a party to the proceedings, is to possess an expert knowledge on valuation, and offers a fair price to an owner and checks that the public funds are not wasted.
31.The claim filed should contain the names of the claimants and co-shares if any rents or profits for last three years and a valuation report of the land from an architect or an engineer.
32.The government can abandon the acquisition proceedings by simply canceling the notification. However, in that case compensation has to be paid under Section 48(2).
33.In determining the compensation the market value of the land is determined at the date of notification. The rise and fall in the value during the period of transaction and notification is taken into consideration.

Compensation is also payable when:
i. Part of the property is proposed for acquisition in such a manner that the remainder depreciates in value.
ii. When the land notified for acquisition has standing crops or trees.
iii. If the person interested has to change his place of residence or business then the excess rent payable for the new premises is also considered for compensation.

34.    Matters which are not taken into consideration for the purpose of land acquisition are:
i. The degree of urgency which has led to the acquisition.
ii. Any disinclination of the person interested to part with the land.
iii. Any increase in the land value likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put when acquired.

35.After necessary inquiries the collector declares his award showing true area of the land, total amount of compensation payable and apportionment of compensation if there are more than one owners or claimants.
36.The collector has to make the award under section 11 within a period of two years from the date of notification.

Reference to Court
37.Any person interested to whom the award is not satisfactory can submit a written application to the court.
38.This application should be made within six weeks from the date of declaration of the award.

Apportionment
39.In apparent of the compensation each of the claimants are entitled to the value of his interest, which he has lost, by compulsory acquisition.
40.Thus it is required to value a variety of interest, rights and claims in the land in terms of money.

41.It is pertinent to mention here that my client since living away from his parental native place, contact you noticee No. 4 & 5 through written communication and orally but it is sorry to say that nobody took any pain to redressal the grievances of my aforesaid clients.

42.You noticees are therefore called upon through this notice, to kindly pay the adequate amount of compensation to the value of my aforesaid clients interest, which they have lost, by compulsory acquisition, after following the due process of Law within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of this legal notice failing which my aforesaid clients would be at liberty to proceed against you noticees before the competent Court of Law at your costs and risks.


A Copy of this legal notice is being kept in my office for future reference.

Thanking you

Yours faithfully



[VIJAY RAGHAV SINGH]

ADVOCATE

Wednesday 13 December 2017

MRS. FARIDA KHAN, Aged about 34 years, W/o Mr. Dilshad Ahmed Khan, D/o Mr. Mansoor Khan, presently residing at 7, Near Akansha Apartment, Khanugaon Square, Ahmadabad Palace Road, Koh-E-Fiza, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.
APPLICANTS/                  :         MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANTS/         :         DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.
The above named appellant/applicant/petitioner has affixed herewith a Court Fee Stamp worth Rs. 110/- + Rs.       /- issuance of notice to the following respondents/non-applicants.
S. No.

Name & address of the persons

Process fee paid
On Merit on stay
1.


2.


3.



4.


5.



6.


7.
DILSHAD KHAN, aged about 36 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
SHAMSHAD AHMAD, Aged about 41years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 47, Islami Gate, Near Kachchi, Shahjahanabad, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
NAUSHAD AHMAD KHAN, aged about 46 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
ASLAM KHAN, Aged about 47 years, S/o Late Mr. Ayub Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
MRS. FAKHRUNISSA, Aged about 66 years, W/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
MRS. SHAHEEN, Aged about 39 years, W/o Mr. Shamshad Ahmad, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
MRS. YASMEEN, Aged about 40 years, W/o Mr. Aslam Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-


Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-


Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-



Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-


Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-



Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-


Rs.15/- +Rs.   /-

Rs.5/- [Extra]




Date of order

Claim valued at

Particulars

15.05.2012


CRR



On Admission and IA 9901/2012 for grant of Stay Only
Jabalpur                                Counsel for –Applicant

Date :         /05/2012                               Vijay Raghav Singh 

1.  DILSHAD KHAN, aged about 36 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

2.  SHAMSHAD AHMAD, Aged about 41years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 47, Islami Gate, Near Kachchi, Shahjahanabad, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

3.  NAUSHAD AHMAD KHAN, aged about 46 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

4.  ASLAM KHAN, Aged about 47 years, S/o Late Mr. Ayub Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

5.  MRS. FAKHRUNISSA, Aged about 66 years, W/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

6.  MRS. SHAHEEN, Aged about 39 years, W/o Mr. Shamshad Ahmad, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

7.  MRS. YASMEEN, Aged about 40 years, W/o Mr. Aslam Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P.G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

1)    DILSHAD KHAN, aged about 36 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

2)    SHAMSHAD AHMAD, Aged about 41years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 47, Islami Gate, Near Kachchi, Shahjahanabad, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
3)    NAUSHAD AHMAD KHAN, aged about 46 years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

4)   ASLAM KHAN, Aged about 47 years, S/o Late Mr. Ayub Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).
5)    MRS. FAKHRUNISSA, Aged about 66 years, W/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

6)    MRS. SHAHEEN, Aged about 39 years, W/o Mr. Shamshad Ahmad, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

7)    MRS. YASMEEN, Aged about 40 years, W/o Mr. Aslam Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P.G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).


The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).

The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).

The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).

The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).

The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).

The Registrar (Judicial)                                     The Registrar (Judicial)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh                           High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).                      Principal Seat at Jabalpur (M. P.).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.
APPLICANTS/          :       MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANTS/ :       DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.
I N D E X
Sno      
Description of documents
Annexure
 Pages
1.
Index

1
2.
Chronology of events

2 TO 7
3.
Memo of criminal revision

8 TO 23
4.
List of Documents

24
5.
Copy of the complaint under Section 12 (1) dated 12.01.2011
A-1
25 TO 39
6.
Copy of the domestic incident report dated 12.01.2011
A-2
40 TO 43
7.
Copy of the application dated 19.05.2011
A-3
44 & 45
8.
Copy of the reply submitted by the non-applicants
A-4
46 & 47
9.
Copy of the application dated 02.09.2011
A-5
48
10.
Copy of the reply dated 21.11.2011
A-6
49 TO 51
11.
Copy of the Order dated 18.01.2012
A-7
52 TO 55
12.
Copy of the impugned Judgment and order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012
A-8
56 TO 58
13.
Application for grant of stay alongwith affidavit

59 TO 61
14.
Vakalatnama

62
PLACE : JABALPUR

DATE :                              ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANTS     
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.

APPLICANTS/          :       MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR

VERSUS

NON-APPLICANTS/ :       DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.

 

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS


S.No
 Date
Events
1.
18.02.2009
Applicant No. 1 married (Nikah) with non-applicant No. 1 on 18.02.2009 in accordance with Muslims rites and customs. After the marriage she went to her matrimonial home and she was subjected to cruelty by (1) Non-applicant No.1- husband, (2) Mother in Law Mrs. Fakhrunissa, (3) Nanad Yasmeen, (4) Non-applicant No. 4 Nandoi, (5) Non-applicant No. 2 Jeth, and (6) Jethani Mrs. Shaheen for bringing less dowry. The applicant No. 1 was sent back to her parental home.
2.
21.05.2010
Applicant No. 1 was blessed with a daughter applicant No. 2 on 21.05.2010 at Bhopal.
3.
04.10.2010
Since the demand of dowry was not fulfilled by the parents of applicant No.1 therefore nobody took care of her during maternity period.  The matter was reported to Pariwar Paramarsh Kendra of Police Station Shahjahanabd on 04.10.2010.
4.
02.11.2010
Thereafter a commission of offences punishable under Section 498-A/34 read with Section 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) in Crime No. 93/2010 before the Mahila Police Station, Bhopal (M. P.) on 02.11.2010 against all the non-applicants.
5.
12.01.2011
Applicants / aggrieved persons filed an application on 12.01.2011 under the provisions of Section 12 (1) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005] against the non-applicant No. 1 to 4 / respondent No. 1 to 4 before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal (M. P.)
6.
12.01.2011
Applicant prayed for the relives of (1) protection order Under Section 18,  (2) residence Order under Section 19, (3) monetary relief under Section 20 (4) Custody Orders under Section 21, (4) Compensation Orders under Section 22. Any other relief deemed fit and proper may also be granted, have been prayed for. The case was registered as Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Criminal) No. 16 of 2011 by the learned trial magistrate.
7.
12.01.2011
Applicant No. 1 also filed domestic incident report before the magistrate under the provision of Section 9 (b) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005] in which cruelty committed by non-applicant No. 5 to 7 was duly narrated in Para 3.
8.
31.01.2011
The Hon'ble Apex Court in Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade Vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade And Others, decided on 31 January, 2011 reported in (2011) 3 SCC 650, considered the definition of Respondent defined under Section 2(q) of the Act of 2005, and held that although section 2(q) defines a respondent to mean any adult male person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person, the proviso widens the scope of the said definition by including a relative of the husband or male partner within the scope of a complaint. Hon'ble Apex Court further held that legislature never intended to exclude female relatives of the husband or male partner from the ambit of complaint that can be made under the provisions of 2005 Act. It is true that expression female has not been used in the proviso to Section 2(q) also, but, no restrictive meaning can be given to expression relative nor has said expression been defined to make it specific to males only.
9.
19.05.2011
Thereafter applicant made an application on 19.05.2011 under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and submitted that (1) Mother in Law Mrs. Fakhrunissa, (2) Jethani Mrs. Shaheen, and (3) Nanad Yasmeen be arrayed as co-respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in the array of cause title.
10.

Non-applicants by filing reply submitted the provisions of code criminal procedure, 1973 (No. 2 of 1974) would be applicable in a proceeding initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005].
11.
02.09.2011
Thereafter applicants made an application for appropriate direction so that their application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 may be read as application under the provisions of Section 2 (q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005].
12.
21.11.2011
Non-applicants by submitting their contended that on facts the law laid don by apex Court is distinguishable.
13.
18.01.2012
The trial Court was pleased to kind enough in allowing the two applications whereby and whereunder directing the applicants to implead the female relative of the husband as as co-respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in the array of cause title.
14.
14.02.2012
Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court, non-applicants preferred a criminal appeal under the provision of Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005].
15.
17.04.2012
The impugned Judgment and order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012.
16.

Applicants preferred a criminal revision under section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (No. 2 of 1974) before the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur against the impugned Judgment and Order passed by the lower appellate Court.



PLACE : JABALPUR


DATE :                              ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANTS     

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.


APPLICANTS/          : 1.   MRS. FARIDA KHAN, Aged about 34 Complainants                          years, W/o Mr. Dilshad Ahmed Khan,
Aggrieved Persons              D/o Mr. Mansoor Khan,

2.     MISS IFRA, Aged about 2 years, D/o Mr. Dilshad Khan, Through natural Guardian mother MRS. FARIDA KHAN, Aged about 34 years, W/o Mr. Dilshad Ahmed Khan, D/o Mr. Mansoor Khan,

Both presently residing at 7, Near Akansha Apartment, Khanugaon Square, Ahmadabad Palace Road, Koh-E-Fiza, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).


VERSUS


NON-APPLICANTS/ : 1.   DILSHAD KHAN, aged about 36 years,
Respondents                      S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o
Husband of aggrieved         House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Jeth of aggrieved        2.     SHAMSHAD AHMAD, Aged about 41
years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 47, Islami Gate, Near Kachchi, Shahjahanabad, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Elder Jeth of aggrieved 3.    NAUSHAD AHMAD KHAN, aged about 46
years, S/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Nandoi of aggrieved    4.     ASLAM KHAN, Aged about 47 years, S/o
Late Mr. Ayub Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Mother in Law of aggrieved 5.  MRS. FAKHRUNISSA, Aged about 66
years, W/o Late Mr. Matloob Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Jethani of aggrieved   6.     MRS. SHAHEEN, Aged about 39 years,
W/o Mr. Shamshad Ahmad, R/o House No. 247, Chouksey Nagar, Near Jawaharlal Neharu Hospital, DIG Bunglow, Beraisa Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).

Nanad of aggrieved    7.     MRS. YASMEEN, Aged about 40 years,
W/o Mr. Aslam Khan, R/o Near Small Mosque, P. G. B. T. College Road, DIG Bunglow, Berasia Road, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh).



CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER 397 / 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [NO. 2 OF 1974]

Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012, arising out of an Order dated 18.01.2012 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mr. Lokendra Singh, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. V/s Dilshad Khan & Ors. in the file of Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Criminal) No. 16 of 2011, the applicants /aggrieved persons most humbly and respectfully begs to prefer the instant criminal revision on following facts and grounds amongst the others :

MATERIAL FACTS OF THE CASE :

1.   This is first criminal revision petition against the impugned Order. Applicant has not filed any criminal revision petition against the impugned Order before any Court of Law.

2.   Applicants / aggrieved persons filed an application on 12.01.2011 under the provisions of Section 12 (1) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005] against the non-applicant No. 1 to 4 / respondent No. 1 to 4 before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal (M. P.) contending inter-alia that applicant No. 1 married (Nikah) with non-applicant No. 1 on 18.02.2009 in accordance with Muslims rites and customs. After the marriage she went to her matrimonial home and she was subjected to cruelty by (1) Non-applicant No.1- husband, (2) Mother in Law Mrs. Fakhrunissa, (3) Nanad Yasmeen, (4) Non-applicant No. 4 Nandoi, (5) Non-applicant No. 2 Jeth, and (6) Jethani Mrs. Shaheen for bringing less dowry. The applicant No. 1 was sent back to her parental home. Applicant No. 1 was blessed with a daughter applicant No. 2 on 21.05.2010 at Bhopal. Since the demand of dowry was not fulfilled by the parents of applicant No.1 therefore nobody took care of her during maternity period.  The matter was reported to Pariwar Paramarsh Kendra of Police Station Shahjahanabd on 04.10.2010. Thereafter a commission of offences punishable under Section 498-A/34 read with Section 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) in Crime No. 93/2010 before the Mahila Police Station, Bhopal (M. P.) on 02.11.2010 against all the non-applicants.

3.   Since the complaint under the provisions of Section 12 (1) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005]  was barred against the female relatives of husband in view of Judgment rendered by this Hon’ble High Court in the case of Ajay Kant And Ors. vs Smt. Alka Sharma decided on 19 June, 2007 reported in  2008 Cri LJ 264 = I (2008) DMC 1= 2007 (4) MPHT 62 = 2008 (2) Crimes 235 (M.P.) = 2008 STPL (LE-Crim) 28892.

4.   Applicant prayed for the relives of (1) protection order Under Section 18,  (2) residence Order under Section 19, (3) monetary relief under Section 20 (4) Custody Orders under Section 21, (4) Compensation Orders under Section 22. Any other relief deemed fit and proper may also be granted, have been prayed for. The case was registered as Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Criminal) No. 16 of 2011 by the learned trial magistrate. Copy of the complaint under Section 12 (1) dated 12.01.2011 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-1.

5.   Applicant No. 1 also filed domestic incident report before the magistrate under the provision of Section 9 (b) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005] in which cruelty committed by non-applicant No. 5 to 7 was duly narrated in Para 3. Copy of the domestic incident report dated 12.01.2011 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-2.

6.   The Hon'ble Apex Court in Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade Vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade And Others, decided on 31 January, 2011 reported in (2011) 3 SCC 650, considered the definition of Respondent defined under Section 2(q) of the Act of 2005, and held that although section 2(q) defines a respondent to mean any adult male person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person, the proviso widens the scope of the said definition by including a relative of the husband or male partner within the scope of a complaint. Hon'ble Apex Court further held that legislature never intended to exclude female relatives of the husband or male partner from the ambit of complaint that can be made under the provisions of 2005 Act. It is true that expression female has not been used in the proviso to Section 2(q) also, but, no restrictive meaning can be given to expression relative nor has said expression been defined to make it specific to males only. Paras 13 to 18 are reproduced as under:-
“13. Having carefully considered the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, we are unable to sustain the decisions, both of the learned Sessions Judge as also the High Court, in relation to the interpretation of the expression respondent in Section 2(q) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. For the sake of reference, Section 2(q) of the abovesaid Act is extracted hereinbelow:
2.(q) 'respondent' means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act: Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of marriage may also file a complaint against the relative of the husband or the male partner,
14. From the above definition it would be apparent that although Section 2(q) defines a respondent to mean any adult male person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person, the proviso widens the scope of the said definition by including a relative of the husband or male partner within the scope of a complaint, which may be filed by an aggrieved wife or a female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage.
15. It is true that the expression female has not been used in the proviso to Section 2(q) also, but, on the other hand, if the legislature intended to exclude females from the ambit of the complaint, which can be filed by an aggrieved wife, females would have been specifically excluded, instead of it being provided in the proviso that a complaint could also be filed against a relative of the husband or the male partner.
16. No restrictive meaning has been given to the expression relative, nor has the said expression been specifically defined in the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, to make it specific to males only. In such circumstances, it is clear that the legislature never intended to exclude female relatives of the husband or male partner from the ambit of a complaint that can be made under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
17. In our view, both the Sessions Judge and the High Court went wrong in holding otherwise, possibly being influenced by the definition of the expression respondent in the main body of Section 2(q) of the aforesaid Act.
18. The appeal, therefore, succeeds. The judgments and orders, both of the learned Sessions Judge, Amravati, dated 15-7-2009 and the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 5-3-2010, in Crl. Writ Petition No.588 of 2009 are set aside. Consequently, the trial court shall also proceed against the said Respondents 2 and 3 on the complaint filed by the appellant”.

7.   Thereafter applicant made an application on 19.05.2011 under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and submitted that (1) Mother in Law Mrs. Fakhrunissa, (2) Jethani Mrs. Shaheen, and (3) Nanad Yasmeen be arrayed as co-respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in the array of cause title. Copy of the application dated 19.05.2011 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-3. Non-applicants by filing reply submitted the provisions of code criminal procedure, 1973 (No. 2 of 1974) would be applicable in a proceeding initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005]. Copy of the reply submitted by the non-applicants is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-4.

8.   Thereafter applicants made an application for appropriate direction so that their application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 may be read as application under the provisions of Section 2 (q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005]. Copy of the application is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-5. Non-applicants by submitting their contended that on facts the law laid don by apex Court is distinguishable. Copy of the reply dated 21.11.2011 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-6.

9.   The trial Court was pleased to kind enough in allowing the two applications whereby and whereunder directing the applicants to implead the female relative of the husband as as co-respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in the array of cause title. Copy of the Order dated 18.01.2012 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-7.

10.                Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court, non-applicants preferred a criminal appeal on 14.02.2012 under the provision of Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005]. The Court below without applying its mind, mechanically, without assigning any reason, reversed and set-aside the order passed by the trial Court arbitrarily and discriminatory. The Judgment impugned is bad in Law and deserves to be set aside. Copy of the impugned Judgment and order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-8. Hence this revision on following grounds amongst the others :

GROUNDS URGED :

A.   The Court below ought to have appreciate that since the complaint under the provisions of Section 12 (1) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [No. 43 of 2005]  was barred against the female relatives of husband in view of Judgment rendered by this Hon’ble High Court in the case of Ajay Kant And Ors. vs Smt. Alka Sharma therefore co-respondents No. 5 to 7 were arrayed as co-respondent but allegations of domestic violence were there in complaint. It is well settled under the Law that the act of court would prejudice no man and after the pronouncement of judgment by the apex Court the applicants bonafidely made application for additional of parties which was rightly allowed by the trial Court.  

B.   The Court below committed serious error of Law in distinguishing the Judgment passed by the apex Court in the Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade Vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade And Others, decided on 31 January, 2011 reported in (2011) 3 SCC 650. The judgment has wrongly interpreted by the Court below.

C.   Because the Court below failed to appreciate that under Section 8 of the Act provides for appointment of the Protection Officer and Section 33 of the Act provides for penalty for not discharging duty by the Protection Officer. Despite, as mentioned in the objects and reasons that for providing a civil remedy, this Act has been enacted, the provisions of Sections 19, 27, 28, 31 to 33 clearly mention that some of the proceedings under the Act are of criminal nature. Under Sections 19 to 22 of the Act an order to provide residential facilities, monetary reliefs, custody order for a child and compensation can be ordered by the Magistrate under the Act. Except a part of Section 19 with regard to direction of execution of a bond and dealing the same as provided under Chapter VIII of the Cr.PC, all the reliefs under Sections 18 to 22 appear to be of civil nature. Thus, some of the proceedings under this Act can be said to be of civil nature and some of the proceedings can be said to be of criminal nature husband in view of Judgment rendered by this Hon’ble High Court in the case of Ajay Kant And Ors. vs Smt. Alka Sharma decided on 19 June, 2007 reported in  2008 Cri LJ 264 = I (2008) DMC 1= 2007 (4) MPHT 62 = 2008 (2) Crimes 235 (M.P.) = 2008 STPL (LE-Crim) 28892.

D.  Because the Court below ought to have appreciated that under Section 20, the Magistrate while disposing of an application under Section 12 of the Act can direct the respondent to pay monetary relief to the aggrieved person in respect of loss of earnings, medical expenses, loss caused due to destruction, damage or removal of any property from her control and maintenance of the aggrieved person as well as her children. He can also order a lump sum payment or monthly payment of the maintenance. Under Section 21 of the Act, the Magistrate may grant temporary custody of the children to the aggrieved person and may deny visit of the respondent to the children of the aggrieved person. Under Section 22, the Magistrate can direct the respondent to make payment of compensation and damages for the injuries, including mental torture and emotional distress. Under Section 23, the Magistrate is competent to pass against the respondent such interim order as he deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. It would thus be seen that on an application moved by the aggrieved person under Section 12 of the Act, the Magistrate can pass orders against the respondent granting relief to the aggrieved person and such orders are essentially civil in nature.

E.   The Court below committed grave error and irregularity in not considering that even though Section 28 (1) of the Act provides that most of the proceedings under the Act shall be governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 28 (2) of the Act gives sufficient latitude to the Court to lay down its own procedure for disposal of the main application under Section 12 as well as the interlocutory application under Sec. 23 (2) of the Act. Section 28 reads thus :
“28.Procedure.
28. Procedure.-(1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, all proceedings under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 and offences under section 31 shall be governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). (2) Nothing in sub-Section (1) shall prevent the court from laying down its own procedure for disposal of an application under section 12 or under sub-section (2) of section 23”. 

F.   The Court below erred in law in not following the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the recent decision in U. SUVETHA VS. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANOTHER (2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 757) has considered the term with reference to Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code and has observed that in the absence of any statutory definition, the term must be assigned a meaning as it is commonly understood and it would include father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, nephew or niece, grandson or granddaughter of an individual or the spouse of any person. In this context, it is pertinent to note that while framing charge for the breach of protection order by the respondent, the Magistrate is authorised under Section 31(3) of the Act to frame charge under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code, if the facts disclose commission of such an offence.

G.  The Court below ought to have appreciated that as seen, the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Act also refers to any 'relative' of the husband or the male partner and the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the Act makes it clear that the word mentioned in proviso to Section 2(q), is not restricted to a relative and would include a relative. But, however, whether relief can be granted against the 'female' relative would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.

H.  The Court below failed to appreciate that Lord Denning in the case of Seaford Court Estates Ltd. v. Asher [1994] 2 All ER 155 wherein he held : "When a defect appears a judge cannot simply fold his hand and blame the draftsman. He must set to work on the constructive task of finding the intention of Parliament and then he must supplement the written words so as to give 'force and life' to the intention of the Legislature. A judge should ask himself the question how, if the makers of the Act had themselves come across this ruck in the texture of it, they would have straightened it out ? He must then do as they would have done. A judge must not alter the material of which the Act is woven, but he can and should iron out the creases". This statement of law made by Lord Denning has been consistently followed by the Apex Court starting in the case of M. Pentiah and Ors. v. Muddala Veeramallappa and Ors. : [1961] 2 SCR 295 and followed as recently as in the case of S. Gopal Reddy v. Slate of Andhra Pradesh : 1996 Cri LJ 3237 

I.    The Court failed to appreciate that the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Act also refers to any 'relative' of the husband or the male partner and the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the Act makes it clear that the word mentioned in proviso to Section 2(q), is not restricted to a 'male' relative and would include a 'female' relative. But, however, whether relief can be granted against the 'female' relative would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Although Section 2(q) defines a respondent to mean any adult male person, who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person, the proviso widens the scope of the said definition by including a relative of the husband or male partner within the scope of a complaint, which may be filed by an aggrieved wife or a female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage. Section 2 (q) reads as under :

“THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005
NO. 43 OF 2005
[13th September, 2005.]

2. Definitions.
2. Definitions.-In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(q) "respondent" means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act:

Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage may also file a complaint against a relative of the husband or the male partner;”




PRAYER

It is, therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that Judgment and Order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012, may kindly be set-aside with costs throughout, in the larger interst of Justice.
PLACE : JABALPUR

DATE :                              ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANTS


IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.


APPLICANTS/          :       MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR


VERSUS


NON-APPLICANTS/ :       DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS



S.No
Description of document
Date of document
Original copy
Number of page
1.
Complaint under Section 12 (1)
12.01.2011
Xerox
15
2.

Domestic incident report dated
12.01.2011
--DO--
04
3.
Application U/o1, R.10 CPC
19.05.2011
--DO--
01
4.
Reply submitted by the non-applicants

--DO--
02
5.
Application
02.09.2011
--DO--
01
6.
Reply submitted by the non-applicants
21.11.2011
--DO--
02
7.
Order passed by trial Court
18.01.2012
--DO--
04
8.
Order passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012
17.04.2012
Certified Copy
03



PLACE : JABALPUR

DATE :                              ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANTS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.

APPLICANTS/          :       MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR

VERSUS

NON-APPLICANTS/ :       DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF STAY

Applicants named above most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under :

1.   Applicants have preferred a Criminal Revision under Section 397 / 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (No. 2 of 1974) against the Judgment and Order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Mr. Binod Kumar Dwivedi, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Dilshad Khan & Ors. V/s Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. in the file of Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2012, arising out of an Order dated 18.01.2012 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mr. Lokendra Singh, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. V/s Dilshad Khan & Ors. in the file of Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Criminal) No. 16 of 2011.

2.   Applicants have a good prima facie case and hope to succeed in it. If during pendency of instant criminal revision, the proceeding pending before the trial Court is not stayed, the applicant would suffer irreparable loss and injury. The balance of connivance too lies in their favor.

3.   From the facts and circumstances, narrated hereinabove in the preceding paras, it is expedient in the larger interest of Justice that pending final disposal of the instant criminal revision, the proceeding pending before the trial court be stayed.

An affidavit in support of this application is being filed herewith.

PRAYER

It is, therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that during pendency of instant criminal revision the proceeding pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mr. Lokendra Singh, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh) in the matter of Mrs. Farida Khan & Anor. V/s Dilshad Khan & Ors. in the file of Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Criminal) No. 16 of 2011, in the larger interst of Justice.
PLACE : JABALPUR

DATE :                              ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANTS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINICIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 862 OF 2012.

APPLICANTS/          :       MRS. FARIDA KHAN & ANOR

VERSUS

NON-APPLICANTS/ :       DILSHAD KHAN & ORS.

AFFIDAVIT

I, MRS. FARIDA KHAN, Aged about 34 years, W/o Mr. Dilshad Ahmed Khan, D/o Mr. Mansoor Khan, presently residing at 7, Near Akansha Apartment, Khanugaon Square, Ahmadabad Palace Road, Koh-E-Fiza, BHOPAL (Madhya Pradesh), the above named deponent, solemnly affirm and state on oath as under:
1.   That I am the applicant No. 1 in the above mentioned criminal revision and am fully conversant with the facts deposed to in the criminal revision.
2.   That the contents of paragraphs 1 to 3 of the accompanying application are true to my personal knowledge and the contents of paragraphs are based on legal advice, which I believe to be true. No material has been concealed and no part is false.

 

JABALPUR
DATED :                                                                    DEPONENT

VERIFICATION

I, MRS. FARIDA KHAN, the above named deponent do hereby verify on oath that the contents of the affidavit above are true to my personal knowledge and nothing material has been concealed or falsely stated. Verified at ______this______day of _______
 
 
DEPONENT



 Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade, on 31 January, 2011 (2011) 3 SCC 650
 
Human and Civil Rights
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

S. 2(q) & proviso thereto and Ss. 12, 18, 19, 20 & 22 – “Respondent'' - Meaning - ``Relative'' of husband or the male partner - Whether include females - Held, legislature never intended to exclude female relatives from ambit of complaint that could be made under 2005 Act - Though expression ``female'' is not used in proviso to S. 2(q), but no restrictive meaning can be given to expression ``relative'' nor has said expression been defined to make it specific to males only - Courts below erred in holding otherwise,  (2011) 3 SCC 650